Insights/Market Economics/

Green BESS Forecast — Own Scenarios

Market Forecast · 2026–2045What-If Scenarios

Green BESS Forecast — What-If Scenarios

The Green BESS Forecast tracks the economic development of PV-BESS co-location projects in Germany — fully market-based, without EEG subsidies. All values in EUR/MWh relative to annual PV generation. Data basis: 5 what-if market price scenarios for 2026–2045 — not developed in collaboration with FfE.

UnitEUR / MWh
Data basisphelas analytics Q1 2026
Period2026–2045
Project10MW Grid + 10MWp PV + BESS

Generation profile

Generation
10,545 MWh/a
Full-load hours
1,055 h/a
Price scenarios
5

The 5 Price Scenarios at a Glance

phelas analytics — proprietary market price forecasts, Q1 2026 Edition

The 5 price scenarios are not classic point forecasts but a "what-if lab" for testing PV, wind and storage revenues under different market and transformation pathways. The basis is real 2024 market behaviour (prices, generation and load profiles), on which a "booster logic" for solar, wind and flexibility buildout is applied per scenario.

Price Scenario 1

Disorderly Transition (Worst Case)

Delayed energy transition and grid expansion — renewables catch up only late. Persistently high, highly volatile prices with strong cannibalisation; negative price hours rise to very high levels (~1,600 h/year).

Price Scenario 2

Downside but Plausible

A slower, costlier but undisrupted transition. Gas remains price-setting for longer; prices decline only gradually and stay elevated. Moderate erosion of the solar capture rate.

Price Scenario 3

Central / Managed Transition

Reference scenario: RE targets largely achieved, system stays balanced and investable. Moderate price level; negative price hours fall to roughly 300–400 h/year by 2060.

Price Scenario 4

Fast Transition, Low Flexibility

Very high RE buildout but insufficient flexibility, storage and grid expansion. Very low prices from strong cannibalisation; negative price hours reach extreme levels (~1,800 h/year).

Price Scenario 5

Coordinated & Flexible

Best-case scenario: high RE buildout meets proactive grid, storage and flexibility expansion. Prices and capture rates stay close together; negative price hours fall to a few dozen h/year by 2060.

Green BESS Forecast 2025, 2027–2030

EUR / MWh
Duration
Storage power
View
Historical 2025138,1 EUR/MWh·Forecast 2027 (range)100,3–135,1 EUR/MWh·Forecast 2030 (range)85,2–127,6 EUR/MWh
i2025 shows the same historical actual market data as the Green BESS Index, normalised to measured PV annual generation 2025 (8,533.21 MWh). From 2027, values are based on phelas what-if market price scenarios (fully merchant, no EEG subsidy), normalised to 10,545 MWh annual generation (PV, 10 MW). Click scenarios in the legend to show/hide them.
Loading…

Extension

Price Scenario 3 now also for Wind North and Wind South

For the reference scenario we now model co-location beyond PV, adding two wind profiles: a northern German site with high full-load hours and a low-wind southern site. All three profiles have 10 MW generation capacity on the same grid connection but differ markedly in volume and timing, and therefore in the value a battery adds.

Price Scenario 3 — PV, Wind North and Wind South with storage

Revenue per MWh generated, 2027 to 2046 · phelas analytics

Storage power

Storage duration

Marketing

without storage
05010015020020272032203720422046EUR/MWh

PV

97.8EUR/MWh

without storage
47.8
Uplift
+50.1 (105 %)
curtailment avoided
1,815 MWh/a
Generation
10,545 MWh/a

Wind North

90.9EUR/MWh

without storage
60.0
Uplift
+30.9 (51 %)
curtailment avoided
1,699 MWh/a
Generation
18,619 MWh/a

Wind South

97.0EUR/MWh

without storage
64.6
Uplift
+32.4 (50 %)
curtailment avoided
1,327 MWh/a
Generation
15,915 MWh/a

All profiles at 10 MW generation capacity on the same grid connection, averaged over 2027 to 2046. The battery charges exclusively from own generation. Values refer to MWh generated rather than exported, so avoided curtailment raises the figure.

Related

Note: All analyses and figures are based on simplified model assumptions and historical market data. They are for illustrative purposes and do not constitute investment advice. Project-specific analyses account for individual site parameters, current market prices, and financing structures.

Model your own projects

Apply the methodology directly to your projects — with personalized scenarios, site parameters, and auditable results.